Call Us Now
Email Us Now
Divorce often brings out difficult behaviors in people. When one spouse suspects the marriage is ending, they may begin spending marital funds recklessly, hiding assets, or deliberately wasting resources to prevent the other spouse from receiving their fair share. Kansas law recognizes this behavior as dissipation of marital assets, and courts can hold the wasteful spouse accountable during property division.
At Barnds Law LLC, we advocate for our clients and provide clear solutions to difficult problems. We understand that financial misconduct during divorce adds betrayal to an already painful situation. This guide explains what dissipation means, how to prove it, and what remedies Kansas courts may provide.
Understanding Dissipation
Dissipation occurs when one spouse uses marital assets for purposes unrelated to the marriage at a time when the marriage is undergoing an irretrievable breakdown. The key elements are that marital funds or assets were used, the use was for non-marital purposes, and the spending occurred during the breakdown of the marriage.
Common examples of dissipation include spending money on an extramarital affair, gambling away marital funds, giving extravagant gifts to a new romantic partner, deliberately destroying marital property, making excessive purchases for personal use knowing divorce is imminent, and transferring assets to friends or family to hide them.
Not every expenditure a spouse dislikes constitutes dissipation. Spending marital funds on legitimate household expenses, even if one spouse disagrees with the spending decisions, is not dissipation. The spending must be wasteful and outside the normal course of the marriage.
Timing Matters
The timing of the spending is crucial for dissipation claims. Kansas courts focus on whether the spending occurred when the marriage was breaking down, not simply after one spouse decided the marriage was over.
Determining when a marriage began its breakdown can be contested. Relevant factors include when the parties separated, when divorce was filed, when affairs or other problems began, and when communication about the marriage’s future changed.
Spending that occurred while the marriage was functioning normally is generally not considered dissipation, even if the marriage later ends. The law does not retroactively make ordinary spending during the marriage improper simply because divorce eventually occurred.
However, spending that occurred after the marriage was clearly in trouble, particularly after separation or filing, faces much greater scrutiny. At that point, both spouses should be preserving marital assets for equitable division, not depleting them.
The Burden of Proof
The spouse alleging dissipation bears the initial burden of showing that marital funds were used for non-marital purposes during the breakdown period. This requires identifying specific transactions, demonstrating that marital funds were used, and showing that the purpose was unrelated to the marriage.
Once the complaining spouse makes this showing, the burden shifts to the spending spouse to justify the expenditures. They must demonstrate that the spending served a legitimate marital purpose or that it occurred before the marriage was breaking down.
This burden-shifting matters because the spending spouse has better access to information about their own spending. Requiring them to explain questionable transactions prevents them from hiding behind silence or vague explanations.
How to Discover Dissipation
Proving dissipation requires financial investigation. Several discovery tools help uncover improper spending.
Bank and credit card statements reveal what was purchased, when, and from where. Unusual patterns, large withdrawals, or spending at unexpected locations can indicate dissipation.
Credit reports show accounts and outstanding balances, potentially revealing hidden credit cards or loans.
Depositions allow questioning the other spouse under oath about their spending, income, and assets. Inconsistencies between their testimony and documented transactions undermine credibility.
Subpoenas to third parties can obtain financial records from banks, credit card companies, employers, and businesses where suspicious transactions occurred.
Forensic accountants can trace complex transactions, identify hidden assets, and quantify total dissipation when dealing with sophisticated financial manipulation.
Red Flags Suggesting Dissipation
Certain patterns suggest that dissipation may have occurred.
Sudden lifestyle changes, such as expensive purchases, frequent travel, or new hobbies coinciding with marital problems, deserve scrutiny.
Large cash withdrawals make spending harder to trace and may indicate intent to hide how money was used.
Secret credit cards or accounts reveal that one spouse was hiding financial activity.
Transfers to family or friends, especially for vague or poorly documented purposes, may be attempts to remove assets from the marital estate.
Business expense irregularities in self-employment situations, where personal spending is run through a business, can obscure dissipation.
Missing documentation suggests deliberate concealment when records that should exist cannot be produced.
Remedies for Dissipation
When dissipation is proven, Kansas courts can account for it in property division. The most common remedy is crediting the dissipated amount to the non-offending spouse.
For example, if the court finds that one spouse dissipated $50,000, that amount may be added back to the marital estate for purposes of division calculations. The offending spouse is treated as having already received $50,000 of their share, and the remaining assets are divided accordingly.
In some cases, courts may make the offending spouse pay the dissipated amount from their separate property or through a larger share of marital debt.
The goal is ensuring that the wasteful spouse does not benefit from their misconduct by reducing the total marital estate available for division.
Protecting Yourself During Divorce
If you suspect your spouse may be dissipating assets, taking protective steps early is important.
Document your financial situation thoroughly. Gather copies of bank statements, tax returns, investment accounts, and other financial records before your spouse can hide or destroy them.
Monitor accounts you have access to. Watch for unusual transactions, account changes, or funds being moved.
Consider seeking temporary orders early in the divorce process. Courts can enter orders prohibiting both parties from dissipating assets, transferring property, or incurring unusual debts during the pendency of the divorce.
Report suspected dissipation to your attorney promptly. The sooner investigation begins, the more likely evidence will be preserved.
The Emotional Dimension
Discovering that your spouse has been wasting marital assets adds insult to injury during an already difficult time. Beyond the financial harm, it represents a betrayal of the partnership and shared sacrifices you made during the marriage.
At Barnds Law LLC, we understand that dissipation cases involve more than numbers. We provide the advocacy and support you need while pursuing the financial accountability you deserve.
How Barnds Law LLC Can Help
Our team approach means multiple attorneys with different perspectives review your case and develop effective strategies. We advocate aggressively while educating you about the process and providing a game plan for what lies ahead.
We handle the difficult legal work so you can focus on what matters most—moving forward with your life.
If you suspect dissipation of marital assets in your Kansas divorce, contact Barnds Law LLC at 913-514-0909 to discuss your situation and learn how we can help protect your interests.
